Matal v. Tam: Evolving Standards of Government Speech in the Music Industry – Columbia Undergraduate Law Review
Prof. Hansen calls Matal v. Tam "Most important free speech case in many years" in SCOTUSblog Post - Fordham IP Institute
Argument analysis: Justices skeptical of federal bar on disparaging trademarks - SCOTUSblog
Supreme Court Case Matal v. Tam and The First Amendment | Free Essay Example
Performance, Keynote Speaker and Q&A: The Slants | 2017-09-30 | Events | Notre Dame Events | University of Notre Dame
Are We Fuct? The Supreme Court to Answer this Trademark Question
whoswholegal - Features - Significant Trademark Decisions in 2017: Free Speech Trumps Lanham Act's Restrictions on Disparaging and Scandalous Trademarks
Matal v. Tam Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained - YouTube
Matal v. Tam: SCOTUS Rules Disparagement Clause in Lanham Act Unconstitutional - Harvard Journal of Law & Technology
Registering the offending, offensive trademark Koo Chin Nam & Co.
Matal v. Tam, 137 S. Ct. 1744 (2017): Case Brief Summary - Quimbee
The Hybrid Trademark and Free Speech Right Forged From Matal v. Tam - NYU Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law
Case Summary: Matal v. Tam (2017) - Street Law, Inc.
Supreme Court rules: banned band no more! - Becket
Case Summary: Matal v. Tam (2017) - Street Law, Inc.
Industry Reaction to SCOTUS First Amendment Decision in Matal v. Tam - IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
Matal v. Tam: SCOTUS Brings a New Slant to Disparaging Trademarks | Beck Reed Riden LLP
Summer SCOTUS Roundup: Trademarks, Disparagement, and Government Speech in Matal v. Tam – Juris Magazine
Supreme Court Case Matal v. Tam and The First Amendment | Free Essay Example
The Supreme Court says offensive trademarks are protected speech
The Curious Case of Trademark Requests for Racial Slurs
The Slants & Supreme Court -- Matal v Tam Decisions Protects Free Speech | National Review
Matal v. Tam Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained - YouTube
